<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Dark Matter that can form Dark Stars · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1004.1258/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1004.1258/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Dark Matter that can form Dark Stars — mentioned by bbor</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45581731</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1004.1258:45581731</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 16:07:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m an amateur but I feel confident enough to answer -- hopefully not a mistake! They&amp;#x27;re explicitly looking for &amp;quot;Dark Matter&amp;quot;, which doesn&amp;#x27;t &amp;quot;interact&amp;quot; with normal (&amp;quot;baryonic&amp;quot;) matter or electromagnetic radiation (e.g. light). So it&amp;#x27;s not a black hole for sure, as those are composed of regular ol&amp;#x27; matter. RE:&amp;quot;dark star&amp;quot;, that&amp;#x27;s really up in the air, I&amp;#x27;d say! AFAICT the only academic reference to that term is for normal stars influenced by dark matter[1], but kinda the whole problem here is that we don&amp;#x27;t know much about what dark matter is composed of or into. Certainly it&amp;#x27;s not going to be a…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1004.1258/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
