arXiv:1003.5831math.LO
The Computable Universe Hypothesis
Abstract
When can a model of a physical system be regarded as computable? We provide the definition of a computable physical model to answer this question. The connection between our definition and Kreisel's notion of a mechanistic theory is discussed, and several examples of computable physical models are given, including models which feature discrete motion, a model which features non-discrete continuous motion, and probabilistic models such as radioactive decay. We show how computable physical models on effective topological spaces can be formulated using the theory of type-two effectivity (TTE). Various common operations on computable physical models are described, such as the operation of coarse-graining and the formation of statistical ensembles. The definition of a computable physical model also allows for a precise formalization of the computable universe hypothesis--the claim that all the laws of physics are computable.
> QA is non-linear when discretised, so no, no one is "replacing" anything. I don't know what any of this is referring to as I never mentioned "replacing" anything. > There is no "digital physics", it's a PR term of a hype industry, not the title of any, eg., textbook on area of…
naaskingView on HNParent context