<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Differential equations over octonions · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1003.2620/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1003.2620/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Differential equations over octonions — mentioned by bbor</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40823210</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1003.2620:40823210</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 18:02:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A) This is one of the best pieces of math pedagogy I&amp;#x27;ve seen in ages. A true &amp;quot;explanation&amp;quot; instead of a &amp;quot;reference&amp;quot; -- thanks for sharing. B) I think we should pass a hacker news law via referendum (that&amp;#x27;s a thing, right? It should be!) that any article mentioning quaternions must also generalize to Octonions, or at least gesture in that vague direction to pay respect. As the first paper I found on Octonion Differentiation says best: Each Cayley-Dickson algebra Ar+1 is obtained from the preceding Ar with the help of the so called doubling procedure [1, 14, 17]. This gives the family of…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1003.2620/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
