<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Addressing mathematical inconsistency: Cantor and Godel refuted · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1002.4433/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1002.4433/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Addressing mathematical inconsistency: Cantor and Godel refuted — mentioned by guerrilla</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32444321</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1002.4433:32444321</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 21:47:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Considering how they host papers &amp;quot;refuting&amp;quot; Cantor and Gödel... seems like a weird time to get standards. https://arxiv.org/abs/1002.4433&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1002.4433/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.GM</category></item></channel></rss>
