PageRank: Standing on the shoulders of giants · HackerPapers discussions

PageRank: Standing on the shoulders of giants — mentioned by dvt

Tue, 20 Jun 2023 20:07:35 GMT

Why is this getting aggressively downvoted? Ironically, there's literally a 2010 math paper entitled "PageRank: Standing on the shoulders of giants[1]." [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1002.2858.pdf

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

PageRank: Standing on the shoulders of giants — mentioned by aneil

Wed, 01 Jun 2022 23:24:17 GMT

I was thinking of the Pinski-Narin method, but there are other earlier uses of eigenvector calculations over very similar data: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1002.2858.pdf

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

PageRank: Standing on the shoulders of giants — HN submission

Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:58:46 GMT

PageRank: Standing on the Shoulders of Giants (2010)

2 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

PageRank: Standing on the shoulders of giants — mentioned by jkldotio

Fri, 16 May 2014 04:17:00 GMT

Massimo Franceschet's 2010 paper "PageRank: Standing on the shoulders of giants" lists some fascinating historical precursors to PageRank.[0][1][2] [0] http://arxiv.org/pdf/1002.2858v3.pdf (pdf) [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.2858 (arxiv) [2] http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?cites=11605628719410021... (citation network, 60 citations) [3] Massimo Marchiori's 1997 paper for comparison http://www.w3.org/People/Massimo/papers/WWW6/ *Edited

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

PageRank: Standing on the shoulders of giants — HN submission

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:31:06 GMT

PageRank: Stand on the shoulders of giants

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.