<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On the impossibility of superluminal travel: the warp drive lesson · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1001.4960/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1001.4960/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On the impossibility of superluminal travel: the warp drive lesson — mentioned by thangalin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6684598</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1001.4960:6684598</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:54:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I was assuming conventional propulsion at 95% c. An Alcubierre warp field would be ideal, assuming the problems can be overcome: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive#Difficulties http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.4960 http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.5708 I&amp;#x27;d enjoy seeing your calculation of the number of years that would have passed on Earth for a round-trip of 100 light-years out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1001.4960/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
