<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Local Kinematics and the Local Standard of Rest · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0912.3693/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0912.3693/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Local Kinematics and the Local Standard of Rest — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30171539</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0912.3693:30171539</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 23:53:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#x27;re right that I inadvertently mischaracterized Siegel&amp;#x27;s article. I expected him to quantify the Z-motion of the solar system in the remainder of the text, and would have known that he did not if I had not lazily and sloppily declined to read the remainder. I simply relied on his reputation as a science popularizer while looking for a popular treatment rather than parametric quantities. Turning to the latter, it is well known that the residual solar motion with respect to the average of local stars is U_sun ~ -10 km s^1, V_sun ~ 5-15 km s^-1, W_sun = 7 km s^-1, leading to the sun moving…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0912.3693/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item></channel></rss>
