<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Global Strong Solutions of the Boltzmann Equation without Angular Cut-off · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0912.0888/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0912.0888/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Global Strong Solutions of the Boltzmann Equation without Angular Cut-off — mentioned by gjm11</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1346915</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0912.0888:1346915</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 09:07:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Paper is at http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.0888 . The Boltzmann equation describes the motion of particles in a fluid. If I&amp;#x27;ve understood the opening section of the paper correctly (which I may not have done), other people have found solutions of the Boltzmann equation under some rather unrealistic assumptions about the distribution of relative velocities when particles collide. (AIUI you&amp;#x27;re supposed to work out that distribution by doing some actual physics, then plug it into the equation; the solutions describe the behaviour of a fluid with the properties encoded in that distribution.)…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0912.0888/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.AP</category></item></channel></rss>
