<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Asymptotic safety of gravity and the Higgs boson mass · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0912.0208/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0912.0208/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Asymptotic safety of gravity and the Higgs boson mass — mentioned by noslenwerdna</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47339244</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0912.0208:47339244</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 18:23:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Asymptotic Safety also predicted the higgs mass (126 GeV vs the measured value of 125 GeV). https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.0208 The trick is, at that time most of the possible mass range was excluded experimentally, so it is a bit less impressive. I&amp;#x27;m not sure how much tuning went into it (possibly none)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0912.0208/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>Asymptotic safety of gravity and the Higgs boson mass — mentioned by mpauly</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19590141</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0912.0208:19590141</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2019 10:35:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The central concept behind Christof Wetterich&amp;#x27;s proposal is scale invariance: Imagine you try to measure the size of the universe with a yard stick. If you measure that the universe is expanding, you can&amp;#x27;t be sure that it really is the universe expanding, or maybe just your yard stick shrinking. This is true in so-called scale invariant theories. These theories do not contain any intrinsic length scale. The moment your theory contains a fundamental length l you break scale invariance. In this case you are able to compare your yard stick to the length l to find out if your yard stick was…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0912.0208/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
