<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Current Status of Graphene Transistors · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0911.4685/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0911.4685/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Current Status of Graphene Transistors — mentioned by gene-h</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20179421</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0911.4685:20179421</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 23:15:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#x27;t exactly understand what the author means by open sourcing graphene. If they mean putting the methods used to produce and do things with graphene out there in the open, scientific journals are for the most part already doing this(although not all journals are open access). One can also copy whatever is in a patent as long as one doesn&amp;#x27;t attempt to sell it. If the author is suggesting that amateurs do interesting work with graphene we run into a couple problems. It&amp;#x27;s difficult for amateurs to obtain even basic chemical reagents and labware. Most chemical suppliers won&amp;#x27;t even sell to…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0911.4685/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.mes-hall</category></item></channel></rss>
