<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Covariant Perturbation Theory (IV). Third Order in the Curvature · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0911.1168/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0911.1168/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Covariant Perturbation Theory (IV). Third Order in the Curvature — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16807840</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0911.1168:16807840</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 03:37:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; QED offers no explanation for gravity It does; gravitation in perturbative QED on time-dependent curved backgrounds has exactly the same explanation as General Relativity. [1] This generalizes very well. [2] One can look at it the other direction too: General Relativity guarantees flat spacetime in the neighbourhood of every point on the manifold with signature 1,3 or 3,1. As long as the radius of curvature is large compared to the system under study there is no trouble at all (QED systems are usually pretty tiny, so you&amp;#x27;re good down to and through astrophysical black hole apparent…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0911.1168/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
