HackerPapers

arXiv:0911.0695quant-ph

Quantum Theory and Beyond: Is Entanglement Special?

Borivoje Dakic, Caslav Brukner

Abstract

Quantum theory makes the most accurate empirical predictions and yet it lacks simple, comprehensible physical principles from which the theory can be uniquely derived. A broad class of probabilistic theories exist which all share some features with quantum theory, such as probabilistic predictions for individual outcomes (indeterminism), the impossibility of information transfer faster than speed of light (no-signaling) or the impossibility of copying of unknown states (no-cloning). A vast majority of attempts to find physical principles behind quantum theory either fall short of deriving the theory uniquely from the principles or are based on abstract mathematical assumptions that require themselves a more conclusive physical motivation. Here, we show that classical probability theory and quantum theory can be reconstructed from three reasonable axioms: (1) (Information capacity) All systems with information carrying capacity of one bit are equivalent. (2) (Locality) The state of a composite system is completely determined by measurements on its subsystems. (3) (Reversibility) Between any two pure states there exists a reversible transformation. If one requires the transformation from the last axiom to be continuous, one separates quantum theory from the classical probabilistic one. A remarkable result following from our reconstruction is that no probability theory other than quantum theory can exhibit entanglement without contradicting one or more axioms.

arXiv comments
14 pages, 4 figures
Journal reference
Deep Beauty: Understanding the Quantum World through Mathematical Innovation, Ed. H. Halvorson (Cambridge University Press, 2011) 365-392
DOI
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 3 threads, from Oct 2021 to Dec 2023.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments3 threads

    • Reminds me of a paper by by Hardy[1] where he introduces five reasonable axioms (his words). Classical and quantum probability theory obeys the first four. However the fifth, which states that there exists continuous transformations between pure states, is only obeyed by the…

      magicalhippoView on HNParent context

    • Lucien Hardy wrote a paper[1] showing how one "naturally" ends up with a quantum theory by demanding a few reasonable axioms. The paper also goes into how this implies complex numbers (and rules out quaternions). Scott Aaronson has a more accessible (and humorous) article on it…

      magicalhippoView on HNParent context

    • Unlike perpetual motion or free energy, the math and physics behind quantum computing is rock solid - the possibility is baked into the framework of quantum mechanics at an absolutely fundamental level. Even if it turned out that all of quantum field theory was completely bogus…

      ceviView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.