<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Gaussian Approximation Potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0910.1019/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0910.1019/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Gaussian Approximation Potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons — mentioned by tfgg</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5770641</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0910.1019:5770641</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 09:53:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;People have tried applying machine learning to learning many-body potentials in physics for use in speeding up quantum molecular dynamics while maintaining most of the accuracy. What you&amp;#x27;d do is say that the total energy of the system is a sum of local potentials on each atom R, where the input is the local environment of atom R: E = \sum_R e(env(R)) You use some method to create some features env(R) that makes the translational and rotational invariance of e() easy, with a radial cutoff beyond some distance, and then model e somehow. I think the most promising method is Gaussian…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0910.1019/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.comp-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
