<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Submarine neutrino communication · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0909.4554/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0909.4554/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Submarine neutrino communication — mentioned by SaberTail</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23902411</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0909.4554:23902411</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2020 22:11:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;My favorite attempt to get the Department of Defense to pay for physics research is a paper that suggests building a muon storage ring and using that to generate a beam of neutrinos to communicate with submarines[1]. The physical principals are pretty sound. We do already generate neutrino beams, like at Fermilab[2]. And we do have the ability to detect neutrinos in water, optically as ANTARES[3] does, or acoustically, as SAUND[4] demonstrated. There are some serious engineering challenges to building a muon storage ring, which is why we don&amp;#x27;t have any. If we could build them, we could build…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0909.4554/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
