<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cutoff for the Ising model on the lattice · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0909.4320/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0909.4320/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Cutoff for the Ising model on the lattice — mentioned by kkylin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14442966</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0909.4320:14442966</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 04:11:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#x27;t mean to imply d(n) does not drop off exponentially (as it should), only that it has a sharp drop-off before the exponential scaling sets in, rather than a steady exponential all the way. Also, if you equip an Ising model with Glauber dynamics, the resulting Markov chain does exhibit a cutoff phenonmenon. See, e.g., https://arxiv.org/abs/0909.4320 .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0909.4320/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.PR</category></item></channel></rss>
