<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Comment on `Quantum resolution to the arrow of time dilemma' · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0909.1726/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0909.1726/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Comment on `Quantum resolution to the arrow of time dilemma' — mentioned by Q_is_4_Quantum</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41784253</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0909.1726:41784253</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 03:32:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It is possible to make quantitative statements that I think capture many of the intuitions you assert. Here was one attempt: https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.10... That particular proposal was mathematically wrong for reasons I still find physically perplexing (it turns out that for some events quantum theory allows for stronger memory records - defined via classial mutual information - of entropy decreasing events!). A simple example is in here: https://arxiv.org/abs/0909.1726 (I am second author).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0909.1726/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
