<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Future of Nuclear Energy: Facts and Fiction Chapter III: How (un)reliable are the Red Book Uranium Resource Data? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0909.1421/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0909.1421/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Future of Nuclear Energy: Facts and Fiction Chapter III: How (un)reliable are the Red Book Uranium Resource Data? — mentioned by jnxx</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24878252</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0909.1421:24878252</guid><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:29:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There are in fact concerns about the amount of nuclear fuel available. See for example: https://arxiv.org/abs/0909.1421 and in more length: http://theoildrum.com/files/O_118_Michael_Dittmar.pdf The author also notes that, as of today, nuclear energy contributes only a very small part of the delivered energy mix.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0909.1421/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.soc-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
