<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Spacecraft Charging and Hazards to Electronics in Space · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0906.3884/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0906.3884/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Spacecraft Charging and Hazards to Electronics in Space — mentioned by T-A</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20674452</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0906.3884:20674452</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 11:36:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Your initial response to me here didn&amp;#x27;t address the exterior field at all My initial response to you was to your statements about a subthread where I addressed the exterior field. &amp;gt; your linked calculations (which you called &amp;quot;the full derivation&amp;quot;) were explicitly just about fields between the plates That was in response to your invocation of angular momentum. &amp;gt; and in fact assumed the plates were infinite. No. This is what I said in that response: &amp;quot;Once it&amp;#x27;s through the screen, the force changes sign, but quickly drops to zero (for infinitely large screens, it is exactly zero everywhere…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0906.3884/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.space-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
