<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0906.1366/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0906.1366/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39546902</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0906.1366:39546902</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 06:33:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The article is mainly about an interesting chapter in the history of the metre &amp;lt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_metre#Meridiona...&amp;gt; which effectively won versus the second/metre pendulum approach (which was fiddly to calibrate and keep true for any given environment at a given point on Earth). The author is a well-known historian of science in the English enlightenment, and notably Newton, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patricia_Fara . I would not expect the article to even touch on 21st century geodesy. A good theory for the solid earth tide only arrived in first dozen years of…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0906.1366/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
