HackerPapers

arXiv:0906.1084cs.CC

Physical portrayal of computational complexity

Arto Annila

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Computational complexity is examined using the principle of increasing entropy. To consider computation as a physical process from an initial instance to the final acceptance is motivated because many natural processes have been recognized to complete in non-polynomial time (NP). The irreversible process with three or more degrees of freedom is found intractable because, in terms of physics, flows of energy are inseparable from their driving forces. In computational terms, when solving problems in the class NP, decisions will affect subsequently available sets of decisions. The state space of a non-deterministic finite automaton is evolving due to the computation itself hence it cannot be efficiently contracted using a deterministic finite automaton that will arrive at a solution in super-polynomial time. The solution of the NP problem itself is verifiable in polynomial time (P) because the corresponding state is stationary. Likewise the class P set of states does not depend on computational history hence it can be efficiently contracted to the accepting state by a deterministic sequence of dissipative transformations. Thus it is concluded that the class P set of states is inherently smaller than the set of class NP. Since the computational time to contract a given set is proportional to dissipation, the computational complexity class P is a subset of NP.

arXiv comments
16, pages, 7 figures
Journal reference
ISRN Computational Mathematics 2012 ID: 321372, 1-15
DOI
doi:10.5402/2012/321372
Subjects
cs.CCComputational Complexity

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Oct 2011 to Oct 2011.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Actual paper at author's web site: http://www.helsinki.fi/~aannila/arto/light.pdf. I have to say that a brief perusal sets off my crank alarms, although the author does appear to be a real physicist. ... Oh. On googling a bit more, I find that the author has also claimed a proof…

      gjm11View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.