<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Sub-diffraction-limit Observation Realized by Nonlinear Metamaterial Lens · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0905.0263/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0905.0263/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Sub-diffraction-limit Observation Realized by Nonlinear Metamaterial Lens — mentioned by tobmlt</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14992430</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0905.0263:14992430</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:46:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;In principle, I am right with ya. We need ways of beating (or at least coping with), the diffraction limit. It&amp;#x27;s fun to think of, say, stuff like this: https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.06351 (as far as big lenses go) Using the sun as a gravitational lens would be pretty sweet. I have a feeling we will have some more tricks to play with E&amp;amp;M locally before we can go to space on that scale though. edit: My own semi-blind musing has made me curious: metamaterials for super-lensing: https://arxiv.org/pdf/0905.0263.pdf entanglment enhanced microscopes?!: https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.8075 (@shpx linked to…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0905.0263/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.optics</category></item></channel></rss>
