<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Correlations, Risk and Crisis: From Physiology to Finance · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0905.0129/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0905.0129/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Correlations, Risk and Crisis: From Physiology to Finance — mentioned by pizza</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10856661</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0905.0129:10856661</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 08:13:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting. I&amp;#x27;m hardly a bio/ecologist but I think that I have some links you may find pertinent: * The Lindy effect [0] is a theory of the life expectancy of non-perishable things that posits for a certain class of nonperishables, like a technology or an idea, every additional day may imply a longer (remaining) life expectancy:[1] the mortality rate decreases with time. This contrasts with living creatures and mechanical things, which instead follow a bathtub curve, where every additional day in its life translates into a shorter additional life expectancy (though longer overall life…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0905.0129/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.bio-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
