<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How Well Do We Know the Orbits of the Outer Planets? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0905.0030/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0905.0030/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>How Well Do We Know the Orbits of the Outer Planets? — mentioned by Zamicol</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17003611</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0905.0030:17003611</guid><pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2018 20:28:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I could have sworn there were problems with Pluto&amp;#x27;s orbit where it was faster/slower than it should have been, but it looks like I&amp;#x27;m wrong. &amp;gt;Specifically, this paper shows that, contrary to recent assertions in the literature, the current ephemeris for Pluto does not preclude the existence of the Pioneer effect. We show that the orbit of Pluto is currently not well enough characterized to make such an assertion. https://arxiv.org/pdf/0905.0030.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0905.0030/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.EP</category></item></channel></rss>
