<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Doves and hawks in economics revisited. An evolutionary quantum game theory-based analysis of financial crises · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0904.2113/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0904.2113/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Doves and hawks in economics revisited. An evolutionary quantum game theory-based analysis of financial crises — mentioned by carterschonwald</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=568728</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0904.2113:568728</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:55:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.2113v1 is the link to the arxiv page and the page of the 1st author is http://www.is-frankfurt.de/personal/personaldetails.php?pern... I find this sort of paper suspect when there aren&amp;#x27;t even necessarily general equilibria existence results for quantum games, but maybe thats just me wanting to only use toy models when the underlying framework is robust enough in its existence of equilibria guarantees that it&amp;#x27;d be possible to scale the model up to representing the actual phenomena&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0904.2113/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>q-fin.GN</category></item></channel></rss>
