<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Gamma-Ray Bursts as a Threat to Life on Earth · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0903.4710/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0903.4710/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Gamma-Ray Bursts as a Threat to Life on Earth — mentioned by throwaway_yy2Di</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8388361</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0903.4710:8388361</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:37:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;What sort of existential risk is this supposed to protect against? The articles&amp;#x27; examples are all wrong (these aren&amp;#x27;t Musk&amp;#x27;s examples): &amp;quot;A billion years will give us four more orbits of the Milky Way galaxy, any one of which could bring us into collision with another star, or a supernova shockwave, or the incinerating beam of a gamma ray burst. We could swing into the path of a rogue planet, one of the billions that roam our galaxy darkly, like cosmic wrecking balls. Planet Earth could be edging up to the end of an unusually fortunate run.&amp;quot; Rogue planets are categorically not a threat to…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0903.4710/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.EP</category></item></channel></rss>
