<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>"Forget time" · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0903.3832/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0903.3832/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>"Forget time" — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18507746</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0903.3832:18507746</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2018 03:50:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I haven&amp;#x27;t read Rovelli&amp;#x27;s pop-sci book. Could you glance through the table of contents and/or the index and look for, among other things, &amp;quot;thermal time&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;time emerges in a world without time&amp;quot;? I would be astonished if he did not discuss these ideas at length in his book. &amp;gt; Rovelli&amp;#x27;s words from a book 23 years newer than your referenced article, seem to directly contradict what you&amp;#x27;re arguing Ok, let&amp;#x27;s deal with that. It&amp;#x27;s not like he stopped writing on the topic or substantially changed his position (rather than elucidating it). You can click on arXiv:1505.01125, arXiv:1407.3384, and…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0903.3832/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item><item><title>"Forget time" — mentioned by keithpeter</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17897469</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0903.3832:17897469</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2018 16:15:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Rovelli mentions his paper from 2009 with the title &amp;#x27;Forget Time&amp;#x27; in the video. The paper can be downloaded from [1]. I enjoyed the presentation. Talking for an hour on this kind of material with just a piece of string and a couple of watches is fairly impressive. The thought experiment with the wooden box and green/red balls (in two size categories unrelated to their colour) was thought provoking. I&amp;#x27;d like to see someone define/construct two sets of macrostates that give a different time scales in a system with one set of microstates. For all I know someone may have actually done that. The…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0903.3832/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
