<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Why photons cannot be sharply localized · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0903.3712/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0903.3712/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Why photons cannot be sharply localized — mentioned by comboy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26336537</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0903.3712:26336537</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 23:46:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;On long distances you are talking about receiving single photons. And while we may view it as probabilistic, it will either interact with our equipment or it won&amp;#x27;t. If it doesn&amp;#x27;t, communication failed. But yes, I wondered about that when writing my comment. Certainly photons are more than just &amp;quot;bullets&amp;quot; that are getting more and more sparse. So I got curious and it seems[1] that in context on our detector you can indeed put hard bounds on where the photon may be received. As far as I understand it, based mostly on the abstract, I do not really grasp it. But ignoring the paper, I think I get…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0903.3712/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
