<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A revision of the proof of the Kepler conjecture · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0902.0350/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0902.0350/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A revision of the proof of the Kepler conjecture — mentioned by sanxiyn</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15212470</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0902.0350:15212470</guid><pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:02:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;And a fault was found! The original proof, as published, is incorrect. The error and the fix was published in &amp;quot;A revision of the proof of the Kepler conjecture&amp;quot; (2009). https://arxiv.org/abs/0902.0350 Note that we now actually know there is no more fault, because formalization is complete.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0902.0350/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.MG</category></item></channel></rss>
