<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Does the Universe Have a Handedness? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0812.3437/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0812.3437/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Does the Universe Have a Handedness? — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36421956</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0812.3437:36421956</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 17:53:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m sorry to say that none of these is close to the review I asked for, and afaics your first result explicitly quotes from and your fourth is preceded by an image taken from the PRL letter (Sadeeh et al) I supplied in my comment&amp;#x27;s second paragraph. The former is a summary of Sadeeh et al&amp;#x27;s results: the constraints on vorticity are unforgivingly strong and vanishingly small. The latter does not even discuss vorticity or rotation or spin outside the caption of said image. Search-fu failure. That the bigthink article is simply pop-sci (Ethan Siegel is very well known) and not a literature…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0812.3437/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item><item><title>Does the Universe Have a Handedness? — mentioned by mindcrime</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21230349</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0812.3437:21230349</guid><pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2019 02:59:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it&amp;#x27;s a shame that you&amp;#x27;re being downvoted for nothing more than expressing a reasonable, albeit apparently unpopular, opinion. For plenty of us, AndrewKemendo is right... learning that there is life on Mars would not answer any particularly fundamental questions. Maybe because a lot of people simply take it as a given that life exists on other planets (whether or not Mars is one of them isn&amp;#x27;t really a big issue) because they don&amp;#x27;t have the hubris to believe that there&amp;#x27;s anything so special about Earth as to believe that life could only emerge here. Frankly, you can count me in that…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0812.3437/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
