<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Astronomical imaging: The theory of everything · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0810.3851/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0810.3851/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Astronomical imaging: The theory of everything — mentioned by SiempreViernes</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18196808</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0810.3851:18196808</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 20:31:48 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Does this make it possible to get closer to David Hogg&amp;#x27;s and Dustin Lang&amp;#x27;s &amp;quot;theory of everything&amp;quot;? (Is that the same D Lang as in the Celeste paper?) That is the idea that a catalogue is released as a complete model of the sky, rather than as a table of intensities and coordinates. (https://arxiv.org/pdf/0810.3851.pdf)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0810.3851/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
