<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Late Ordovician geographic patterns of extinction compared with simulations of astrophysical ionizing radiation damage · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0809.0899/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0809.0899/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Late Ordovician geographic patterns of extinction compared with simulations of astrophysical ionizing radiation damage — mentioned by bediger4000</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43400745</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0809.0899:43400745</guid><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:38:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, completely overstated. The 2009 paper on the supernova causing the Ordovician extinction (https://arxiv.org/pdf/0809.0899) has always been viewed skeptically, even for a paleontology paper. The Ordovician extinction has always been contentious. There&amp;#x27;s evidence of a severe ice age, but ocean water temperature proxies don&amp;#x27;t line up. There&amp;#x27;s even a &amp;quot;It didn&amp;#x27;t happen&amp;quot; faction among paleontologits. There&amp;#x27;s probably 4 other plausible theories for that particular mass extinction, including 2 kinds of volcanism, dust influx from the L-Chondritic parent body breakup causing the ice age, land…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0809.0899/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item><item><title>Late Ordovician geographic patterns of extinction compared with simulations of astrophysical ionizing radiation damage — mentioned by bediger4000</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10375134</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0809.0899:10375134</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:31:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I kind of expected the article to at least mention the end Ordovician Extinction by gamma ray burst theory: http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.0899 http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0309415 http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.7049&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0809.0899/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
