<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Conservation Laws and Non-Lie Symmetries · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0808.3943/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0808.3943/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Conservation Laws and Non-Lie Symmetries — mentioned by crntaylor</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5059538</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0808.3943:5059538</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:24:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I remember studying some of Noether&amp;#x27;s early work in a course on classical mechanics at university. It&amp;#x27;s one of the things I remember from my degree that still blows my mind. Noether&amp;#x27;s theorems in classical mechanics associate symmetries of the laws governing a physical system to conservations laws of that system. For example, Spatial translation symmetry =&amp;gt; Conservation of momentum Spatial rotation symmetry =&amp;gt; Conservation of angular momentum Time translation symmetry =&amp;gt; Conservation of energy Phase symmetry =&amp;gt; Conservation of electric charge When you study relativity, and unify space and…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0808.3943/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.AP</category></item></channel></rss>
