<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Crossing the Phantom Divide with Parameterized Post-Friedmann Dark Energy · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0808.3125/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0808.3125/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Crossing the Phantom Divide with Parameterized Post-Friedmann Dark Energy — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49408670</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0808.3125:49408670</guid><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 13:22:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem is in allowing perturbations around effective w_{DE}=-1. The &amp;quot;phantom divide crossing&amp;quot; is the evolution of dark energy&amp;#x27;s effEOS across w = -1, the boundary between a quintessence regime (w &amp;gt; -1) and a phantom dark energy (w &amp;lt; -1) regime. Phantom models generically violate the null energy condition. A local crossing thus causes all sorts of problems for minimally coupled single scalar field DE (see e.g. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.087303 aka https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.3125) as fluctuations of the DE field into the phantom regime must be controlled or offset assuming one…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0808.3125/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
