<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Preferred-Frame and CP-Violation Tests with Polarized Electrons · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0808.2673/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0808.2673/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Preferred-Frame and CP-Violation Tests with Polarized Electrons — mentioned by ISL</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21744855</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0808.2673:21744855</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 18:09:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Objects with spin can be point-like but carry angular momentum. The electron is one such particle. It is &amp;quot;intrinsic&amp;quot; because it has no known moving parts. If it had moving parts, and that motion had net angular momentum, we would refer to it in many contexts as &amp;quot;orbital angular momentum&amp;quot;. Spin should seem counterintuitive. There are no macroscopic objects that I am aware whose spin you can feel with your hands. Our research group has an object with 10^23 polarized spins (and negligible net magnetic moment) -- observing the angular momentum effects directly requires a sensitive modern torsion…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0808.2673/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ex</category></item></channel></rss>
