<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Closed Timelike Curves Make Quantum and Classical Computing Equivalent · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0808.2669/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0808.2669/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Closed Timelike Curves Make Quantum and Classical Computing Equivalent — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49572431</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:0808.2669:49572431</guid><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 02:13:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A documentary about a scientist who thinks time loops are real&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The current consensus driving the scale-up of AI data centers rests on two assumptions: The human brain is a biological computer operating without quantum effects. The human brain does not solve computationally &amp;quot;hard&amp;quot; problems (NP-hard / PSPACE); it merely runs efficient heuristic approximations. Under these assumptions scaling classical compute architectures will eventually match biological cognitive capacity. With this in mind I made a documentary. Last summer I followed Henrik Kjeldsen, a Teaching Professor of Biomedical Engineering in Denmark, who argues the assumptions above are…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0808.2669/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
