<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The kinematic origin of the cosmological redshift · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0808.1081/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0808.1081/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The kinematic origin of the cosmological redshift — mentioned by bananabreakfast</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21983633</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0808.1081:21983633</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 19:23:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;So that source draws a line between cosmological redshift and doppler redshift that is so misleading I&amp;#x27;d say it&amp;#x27;s wrong. They are in fact equivalent [1] and basically just depend on your reference frame. Check out the wikipedia page on Hubble&amp;#x27;s Law [2] for more. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.1081 [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble%27s_law&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0808.1081/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.pop-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
