<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Classification of Spreadsheet Errors · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0805.4224/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0805.4224/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Classification of Spreadsheet Errors — mentioned by belter</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46905157</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0805.4224:46905157</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 20:55:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I have the impression today you will be one of the 10,000: https://xkcd.com/1053/ But you are correct, this entire site is full of idiots confidently spouting nonsense... :-) &amp;quot;Floating-point arithmetic may give inaccurate results in Excel&amp;quot; - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/microsoft-365... &amp;quot;Classification of Spreadsheet Errors&amp;quot; - https://arxiv.org/pdf/0805.4224 &amp;quot;A study conducted by Coopers &amp;amp; Lybrand found errors in 90% of the spreadsheets audited.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Impact of Errors in Operational Spreadsheets&amp;quot; - https://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0715 &amp;quot;What We Don’t Know About Spreadsheet Errors…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0805.4224/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item></channel></rss>
