<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Almost-natural proofs · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0805.1385/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0805.1385/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Almost-natural proofs — mentioned by vznvzn</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4903007</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0805.1385:4903007</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:24:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;here chow elaborates further/in depth on the &amp;quot;natural&amp;quot; condition in the Razborov Rudich proof &amp;amp; finds some evidence for &amp;quot;nearby&amp;quot; functions that potentially could be used to defy the Razborov-Rudich natural proofs barrier: http://arxiv.org/pdf/0805.1385v3.pdf &amp;quot;By definition, a natural combinatorial property satisfies two conditions, constructivity and largeness. Our main re- sult is that if the largeness condition is weakened slightly, then not only does the Razborov–Rudich proof break down, but such “almost-natural” (and useful) properties provably exist.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0805.1385/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CC</category></item></channel></rss>
