<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On the origin of the particles in black hole evaporation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0804.1686/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0804.1686/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On the origin of the particles in black hole evaporation — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34946210</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0804.1686:34946210</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2023 15:23:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#x27;m sure it&amp;#x27;s wrong in important ways I&amp;#x27;m afraid so. I&amp;#x27;ll just pick on two important ways found in one of your key sentences, and I&amp;#x27;ll stick to widely accepted results from Hawking, Unruh, Gibbons and Giddings. &amp;gt; Particles at the edge of the sphere are able to leak back into the parent universe via Hawking radiation just like our galaxies at great distance slip out of our universe red-shifted faster than the speed of light. Firstly, Hawking radiation doesn&amp;#x27;t leak anything out of the black hole itself; it&amp;#x27;s produced by interactions between the outside matter fields and the dynamical…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0804.1686/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
