HackerPapers

arXiv:0804.1126physics.ao-ph

Target atmospheric CO2: Where should humanity aim?

J. Hansen, M. Sato, P. Kharecha, D. Beerling, R. Berner, V. Masson-Delmotte, M. Pagani, M. Raymo, D. L. Royer, J. C. Zachos

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Paleoclimate data show that climate sensitivity is ~3 deg-C for doubled CO2, including only fast feedback processes. Equilibrium sensitivity, including slower surface albedo feedbacks, is ~6 deg-C for doubled CO2 for the range of climate states between glacial conditions and ice-free Antarctica. Decreasing CO2 was the main cause of a cooling trend that began 50 million years ago, large scale glaciation occurring when CO2 fell to 450 +/- 100 ppm, a level that will be exceeded within decades, barring prompt policy changes. If humanity wishes to preserve a planet similar to that on which civilization developed and to which life on Earth is adapted, paleoclimate evidence and ongoing climate change suggest that CO2 will need to be reduced from its current 385 ppm to at most 350 ppm. The largest uncertainty in the target arises from possible changes of non-CO2 forcings. An initial 350 ppm CO2 target may be achievable by phasing out coal use except where CO2 is captured and adopting agricultural and forestry practices that sequester carbon. If the present overshoot of this target CO2 is not brief, there is a possibility of seeding irreversible catastrophic effects.

arXiv comments
20 pages, 7 figures; final version accepted by Open Atmospheric Science Journal; supporting article separately submitted to arXiv as "Target atmospheric CO2: Supporting material", arxiv:0804.1135
Journal reference
Open Atmos. Sci. J. (2008), vol. 2, pp. 217-231
DOI
doi:10.2174/1874282300802010217
Subjects
physics.ao-phAtmospheric and Oceanic Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Nov 2014 to Nov 2014.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • So, if we continue the thought experiment, and say thousands of people have been making observations of the comet for five years and have come to roughly 50% impact probability estimate, with multiple independent methods. And that impact would likely kill maybe a billion people.…

      GravitylossView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.