<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Advection-Dominated Accretion and the Black Hole Event Horizon · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0803.0322/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0803.0322/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Advection-Dominated Accretion and the Black Hole Event Horizon — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16483922</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0803.0322:16483922</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 16:14:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Keep in mind as well that no observation has yet distinguished between a neutron star and a black hole. No, that&amp;#x27;s wrong. Narayan, R. and McClintock, J.E., New Astronomy Reviews, 51, 733–51, 2008 [arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/0803.0322 ] has a beautiful chart (Fig. 8) comparing the quiescent bolometric luminosity of star-to-accreting-neutron star binaries and star-to-accreting-black hole binaries. Observed NS binaries are brighter than observed BH (candidate) binaries. This is one test for whether a compact accretor in a binary is a BH rather than an NS. This technique was used by Bennett…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0803.0322/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
