<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Rapid Spreadsheet Reshaping with Excelsior: multiple drastic changes to content and layout are easy when you represent enough structure · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0803.0163/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0803.0163/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Rapid Spreadsheet Reshaping with Excelsior: multiple drastic changes to content and layout are easy when you represent enough structure — mentioned by giardini</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20420785</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0803.0163:20420785</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:02:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe. Jocelyn Ireson-Paine has a deep knowledge of the problems and some solutions for spreadsheets: https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2014/02/05/category-the... Paine has long worked with the European Spreadsheet Risks Interest Group (eusprig.org) and has used category theory to develop a system in Prolog called Excelsior about which he says &amp;quot;Excel lacks features for modular design. Had it such features, as do most programming languages, they would save time, avoid unneeded programming, make mistakes less likely, make code-control easier, help organisations adopt a uniform house style…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0803.0163/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item></channel></rss>
