HackerPapers

arXiv:0802.3457cs.SE

Spreadsheet Errors: What We Know. What We Think We Can Do

Raymond R. Panko

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Fifteen years of research studies have concluded unanimously that spreadsheet errors are both common and non-trivial. Now we must seek ways to reduce spreadsheet errors. Several approaches have been suggested, some of which are promising and others, while appealing because they are easy to do, are not likely to be effective. To date, only one technique, cell-by-cell code inspection, has been demonstrated to be effective. We need to conduct further research to determine the degree to which other techniques can reduce spreadsheet errors.

arXiv comments
9 Pages, 2 Tables
Journal reference
Proc. European Spreadsheet Risks Int. Grp. (EuSpRIG) 2000 7-17 ISBN:1 86166 158 4
DOI
Subjects
cs.SESoftware Engineering cs.HCHuman-Computer Interaction

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Mar 2016 to Mar 2016.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • "Quite simply, we do not think the way we think we think. Human cognition is built on complex mechanisms that inherently sacrifice some accuracy for speed. Speed in thinking was the overriding evolutionary force for our hunter ancestors, and although occasional errors caused the…

      keithpeterView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.