<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Computational Models of Spreadsheet Development: Basis for Educational Approaches · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0801.4274/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0801.4274/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Computational Models of Spreadsheet Development: Basis for Educational Approaches — mentioned by lliwta</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7949493</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0801.4274:7949493</guid><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:30:06 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m familiar with this characterization. I just don&amp;#x27;t think it&amp;#x27;s representative of realistic spreadsheet programming (edit: or many existing implementations). Here&amp;#x27;s an excellent quote from the conclusion of a paper on the topic stating exactly this viewpoint (and they aren&amp;#x27;t even referring to macros afaict) [1]: Current spreadsheet implementations do not strictly follow any of the established conceptual models. They rather follow a teleological approach of “what the user probably intends to do”. But phrases containing the word “probably” are problematic as they do not hold for all…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0801.4274/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.HC</category></item></channel></rss>
