<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Volume Inside a Black Hole · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0801.1734/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0801.1734/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Volume Inside a Black Hole — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44118614</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0801.1734:44118614</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 17:42:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The mean density of the interior is much much much lower than you think, because the Schwarzschild interior volume is enormously larger than that of a closed Euclidean 3-ball of the Schwarzschild radius. Some details: Christodoulou &amp;amp; Rovelli 2014 showed that the maximal interior volume of a Schwarzschild black hole increases with time &amp;lt;https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.2854&amp;gt;. There is plenty of follow-on work in the literature for other varieties of black hole, and it is pretty generic that a black hole gets REALLY BIG inside as it gets older. I have previously aimed HNers at DiNunno &amp;amp; Matzner 2008…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0801.1734/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item><item><title>The Volume Inside a Black Hole — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41934600</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0801.1734:41934600</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 11:48:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The area of the Sun and the Earth and every other self-gravitating body in hydrostatic equilibrium is also proportional to the body&amp;#x27;s mass. Volumes are weird though: unlike area, relativistic volume can depend on the body&amp;#x27;s (and the spacetime&amp;#x27;s) history and composition rather than just the body&amp;#x27;s mass. In general the spatial volumes inside massive bodies in curved spacetime are larger than in Euclidean-Newtonian space. The volume deviation is carried in the Ricci tensor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricci_curvature#Direct_geometr... http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0401099v1 (section 5.2)…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0801.1734/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item><item><title>The Volume Inside a Black Hole — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38173443</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0801.1734:38173443</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 05:00:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The interior volume of a black hole doesn&amp;#x27;t work much like the interior volume of 3-ball &amp;lt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_(mathematics)&amp;gt;, except perhaps the regions closest to (but inside) the horizon in the limit of the largest black holes. The short version is that a black hole&amp;#x27;s interior volume grows throughout its lifetime, and the interior of an eternal black hole grows to infinity, even if the area of the event horizon remains unchanged. It&amp;#x27;s essentially the inverse of a Gabriel&amp;#x27;s horn &amp;lt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabriel%27s_horn&amp;gt;, which develops an infinite surface area (as…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0801.1734/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
