<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Data Tables for Lorentz and CPT Violation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0801.0287/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0801.0287/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Data Tables for Lorentz and CPT Violation — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32171421</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0801.0287:32171421</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 20:03:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;2/2 [sorry that this will be out of order] For a (physical) relativist, the speed of light is really simple. c = 1, everywhere and everywhen. &amp;lt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometrized_unit_system&amp;gt; This is because we have excellent evidence for the utility of &amp;lt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudo-Riemannian_manifold#App...&amp;gt;, and the further astrophysically-driven demands of global hyperbolicity or at least reasonably strong causality conditions, no isometric embeddings, geodesic incompleteness, asymptotic flatness around sources, junctions in sufficiently flat space, and energy conditions.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0801.0287/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item><item><title>Data Tables for Lorentz and CPT Violation — mentioned by Jach</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2506678</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0801.0287:2506678</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 15:56:29 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Hold on, where are you getting the CPT-symmetry violation from? This paper http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0287v4 has a collection of experimental results hinting at that but the conclusion does not as yet seem to be very strong.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0801.0287/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
