<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Insights into glass formation and glass transition in supercooled liquids, by study of related phenomena in crystals · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0712.4233/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0712.4233/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Insights into glass formation and glass transition in supercooled liquids, by study of related phenomena in crystals — mentioned by auferstehung</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=94761</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0712.4233:94761</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:50:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It is my understanding that the hard part is when m/n ~1 (P/N~1 in wikipedia terms). Does your O(sqrt(2)^N) algorithm work well for 1000 numbers between 1 and 2^1000. Wikipedia says, &amp;quot;We give efficient algorithms for both small N and small P cases below,&amp;quot; which would seem to imply the answer is no. Regardless, the most interesting aspect of the article to me was the existence of a phase transition between easy and hard parts of this type of problem. I found the reference to Stephan Mertens work relating this computational problem to statistical physics, specifically spin glasses, the most…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0712.4233/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.dis-nn</category></item></channel></rss>
