<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bigravity as an interpretation of the cosmic acceleration · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0712.0067/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0712.0067/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Bigravity as an interpretation of the cosmic acceleration — mentioned by dragonbonheur</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18611634</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0712.0067:18611634</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 19:31:48 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like the rest of the world is about to catch up with Jean-Pierre Petit&amp;#x27;s theories about negative masses surrounding positive mass objects like galaxies and holding them together... Even the proposal for the modification of Einstein&amp;#x27;s theories... Times are a&amp;#x27;changin. It took almost ten years (2007-2017) from JPP being shunned by the scientific community (and the highly politicised French Wikipedia) to others &amp;quot;discovering&amp;quot; the same things he had been saying all along. https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.0067 http://jp-petit.org/papers/cosmo/2018-AstrophysSpaceSci.pdf You may give yourselves the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0712.0067/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.gen-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
