<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Possible CP-Violation effects in core-collapse Supernovae · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0710.3112/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0710.3112/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Possible CP-Violation effects in core-collapse Supernovae — mentioned by sanxiyn</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11652325</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0710.3112:11652325</guid><pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2016 02:24:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; every physical phenomenon we&amp;#x27;re capable of observing here on earth with any instruments we&amp;#x27;ve invented to date This is stronger than &amp;quot;everyday life&amp;quot; claim, and likely false. Note that the article carefully excludes &amp;quot;fancy telescopes&amp;quot;: there is a reason. For example, we can observe supernovae. We don&amp;#x27;t have satisfactory model of core-collapse supernovae yet. In other words, if you set initial condition to right before explosion and simulate forward, stars don&amp;#x27;t explode in simulation. And critically, it is seriously entertained that this may be due to physics beyond the Standard Model, unlike…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0710.3112/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
