<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Evolution of the genetic code from the GC- to the AGUC-alphabet · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0710.0445/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0710.0445/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Evolution of the genetic code from the GC- to the AGUC-alphabet — mentioned by bediger</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1958824</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:0710.0445:1958824</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:16:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Some biologists have made a case for DNA replication evolving twice, independently: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC148579/pdf/27338... Apparently you can also make a case for the evolution of DNA itself, possibly from a 2-letter alphabet: http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.0445&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/0710.0445/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>q-bio.PE</category></item></channel></rss>
